The identity of the Casefile host: why I (partly) deleted his dark secret

caseyOne of the most stunning podcast success stories in recent years, is Casefile, a true crime podcast started just over two years ago by a mystery Australian bloke “from a spare room in his house”.

Narrated anonymously, his distinctive Australian drawl has added an element of creepiness to tales drenched in blood. Every week hundreds of thousands of listeners, indeed sometimes many millions, download or stream the latest Casefile podcast.

With this viral success, the podcast has quickly become a slick, commercial venture with advertising, a creepy soundtrack and professional production qualities.

A team of engineers, producers, composers and researchers have sprung up around the Casefile creator and host.

But his identity – like some of unsolved crimes described on the podcast – remains a closely guarded secret and up until recently, had never been revealed.

In an interview with in October 2016, the Casefile host said he wanted remain anonymous so that he could “stay out of the story and “let the facts speak for themselves”.

“I’m just a random Aussie guy, in my spare bedroom, running a podcast,” he said modestly.

As a naturally curious journalist, I decided to take up the challenge and try to found out who the Casefile host was.

It wasn’t really hard – if you know where to look.

Indeed, for someone who wanted to remain anonymous it was pretty easy to find out who he was.

And so last week, I ran a story, briefly, on this blog revealing his *identity.

If you were one of the 100 or so people who read the blog, you would know who he is and would have seen his photograph.

Soon after it was published and Tweeted and Facebooked, the Casefile host contacted me and asked me not to reveal his identity and to remove the post and all my social media about it.

casefile tweet

I was bemused by his reaction, as I thought his anonymity was a “marketing gimmick” and that it if a blogger revealed it would not make any difference to the show or how it is presented.  Indeed many of his fans crave to know who he is.

But no, he told me, it had nothing to do with marketing but affected his “real world life”  and his “ability to do the show”. (This of course begs the question, what does he do when he’s not making podcasts? Is he a spy? Does he work in some secret government department?)

casefile tweet 2

In the end I took it down, in exchange, hopefully for an interview with him that I hope might draw a few more readers to my humble blog. This he said he would consider if his secret identity remained in tact.

Let’s see what happens.

Of course, I remain intrigued as to why his anonymity is so vital to the show’s viability. No other podcasts I know of have anonymous narrators. In fact, most podcast creators and narrators like Joe Rogan and the hosts of the ground breaking Serial have become famous in their own right.

And so while the Casefile host insists on not making his identity part of the murderous stories he tells,  for me, his identity has, ironically, become the story.

As, I think it always has been for many of his faithful listeners.


A  few identity tidbits:

*In an interview with Rolling Stone magazine, the Casefile host referred to himself as Brad, which I can tell you is his real name, or Bradley to be more specific

*He lives about two hours south of Sydney (a small coastal town near Wollongong) and he’s in his mid-30s.

*His interests include poker and rugby league (Manly Sea Eagles)


4 thoughts on “The identity of the Casefile host: why I (partly) deleted his dark secret

  1. Unfortunately, revealing the Casefile creator and host’s identity—against his sincerely expressed wishes—is to be expected from wannabe journalists who look to gossipy, lowbrow periodicals like Rolling Stone for inspiration. These publications and their contributors profit from and revel in invading and disrespecting the privacy of their articles’ subjects—driven particularly by hopes of finding something sordid to embellish and present to their readership.
    That said, thank you for having the decency to pull the article after host “Brad” so politely requested you do so.


  2. I was also curious about who this fellow Aussie was, now after seeing his response to you doxxing him I agree his identity should remain completely anonymous.

    Perhaps he’s a police officer, this would directly affect his ability to earn a living should your post out him.

    Furthermore, your identity tidbits should be removed also for this reason – was it really necessary to add those in ? it’s like a passive aggressive way of sticking it to him when from what I can see, he has been quite reasonable and accommodating with his requests.

    He creates great content – just let it be move on.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s